Blog, culture and engagement | Ambition In Motion

by Grace Tripathy

Fri 4 April 2025

For years, a large retail company stood at the pinnacle of its industry. Once known for being an industry leader, the company now faced declining revenues, dwindling market appeal, and a growing perception of being outdated. Internally, employees felt disengaged, and stakeholders began questioning the company's ability to innovate.

Jenna, the company’s Chief Strategy Officer saw the warning signs: flatlining sales, a lack of excitement around new product launches, and a growing disconnect between leadership and consumers. But by the time these trends became impossible to ignore, the company was already slipping. She knew that a rebranding effort couldn’t just be cosmetic; it required a deep, cultural shift that engaged employees, reinvigorated consumer trust, and positioned the company as a forward-thinking leader once again.

Recognizing the Shift Before It’s Too Late

Many companies fail to notice their decline until it's too late. Signs of stagnation such as declining market share, reduced consumer engagement, and an outdated brand perception often creep in gradually. The large company had long relied on its reputation, assuming customer loyalty would remain intact. But Jenna understood that a successful company cannot operate on past achievements alone. Monitoring industry trends, consumer sentiment, and internal engagement through regular feedback loops, data analytics, and direct customer insights are critical to staying ahead. Companies must use tools to detect early warning signs of market and company shifts.

Taking Action: Rebranding as a Cultural Transformation

Rebranding is more than just a new logo or marketing campaign—it’s a company-wide commitment to change. The company’s leadership recognized that for their rebranding to succeed, employees had to be at the center of the transformation. Jenna led an initiative to involve employees at every level, conducting internal surveys, town hall meetings, and brainstorming sessions that encourage innovation and direct input from those on the ground. She partnered with HR to redefine corporate values, aligning them with a more customer-centric and agile mindset.

To truly reshape the company’s culture, leadership adopted a transparent approach. They communicated the company’s challenges openly, showing employees why change was necessary and how they could be a part of the solution. Incentives were introduced to reward innovative ideas, and cross-functional teams were formed to pilot new projects. Employees who once felt disconnected from leadership now saw themselves as vital players in the company's evolution.

Gaining Employee Buy-In for Lasting Change

For rebranding and cultural transformation to be successful, employees must feel like active participants rather than passive recipients of change. Engagement and enthusiasm stem from clear communication, meaningful involvement, and a sense of ownership. Employees need to understand not only what is changing but why it matters and how they contribute to the company's renewed vision.

How to Get Employee Buy-In for Rebranding and Cultural Change:

Communicate the Vision Clearly – Employees need to understand the rationale behind the change and how it aligns with the company's future.
Involve Employees Early – Solicit input through surveys, brainstorming sessions, and open discussions to make employees feel heard.
Create Cross-Functional Teams – Encourage collaboration across departments to foster innovation and shared responsibility.
Recognize and Reward Contributions – Acknowledge employees who bring creative ideas and drive the transformation forward.
Provide Training and Development – Equip employees with new skills and knowledge to adapt to the evolving company culture.
Lead by Example – Leadership should model the behaviors and values they want to instill in the organization.
Celebrate Milestones – Regularly highlight successes and progress to maintain momentum and enthusiasm.

Rebuilding Consumer Trust and Market Relevance

With an energized workforce, the company turned its focus outward. Re-establishing trust with consumers required more than an updated brand identity—it needed genuine engagement. The company launched interactive campaigns, leveraging social media to connect directly with customers and solicit real-time feedback. Personalized experiences, product enhancements driven by consumer insights, and strategic partnerships with influencers helped reintroduce the company as a brand that listened, adapted, and innovated.

Additionally, leadership worked on rebuilding trust with stakeholders by showing clear, measurable progress. Transparency in reporting, a commitment to sustainability, and a renewed focus on corporate social responsibility reassured investors and partners that the company’s transformation was more than just rhetoric.

The Outcome

Two years after initiating the rebranding strategy, the company saw a remarkable turnaround. Employee engagement scores were at an all-time high, product launches were met with renewed excitement, and the company’s financial performance rebounded. Customers who once viewed the brand as stale now saw it as dynamic and responsive to their needs.

For Jenna and the company’s leadership, the experience served as a crucial lesson: reinvention is not a one-time event but a continuous process. Businesses that remain agile, listen to their consumers, and empower employees to drive innovation will always have a competitive edge.

by Kendall Barndollar

Fri 4 April 2025

Strong team relationships are paramount to a positive company culture, specifically during the early growth phases. These connections improve psychological safety and build trust within a team, improving collaboration and employee engagement. As companies grow, their needs evolve, yet many CEO’s decisions are impacted by their long-standing friendships. While CEO friendships with team members can foster a positive company culture, when these relationships cloud judgment, it can result in poor decision-making, increased mistakes, and losses for organizations. To maintain long-term success, CEO’s must find the balance between relationships and professional accountability.

In the workplace, there are many benefits to developing friendly relationships within teams. Groups prioritizing relationships tend to have clearer communication and increased collaboration. Relationships and connections built with a CEO increase transparency and psychological safety in the workplace. The full benefits of a communicative team are only enabled through two-way communication between a leader and their team. Simultaneously, psychological safety can be improved as leaders foster an environment where employees feel more confident sharing feedback and ideas across levels. Combined, these improvements are critical for sustaining growth through the early stages of an organization. However, one of the most crucial focuses for many executives is building team trust. When the CEO of a company takes time to develop relationships with employees across different groups and positions, they can impact the culture of their team, improving employee engagement and commitment.

In the beginning stages of a company, executives must become friendly because, in this stage, relationships are a cornerstone to success. In the early stages of a company, the CEO and employees are likely friendly, working in a small but collaborative and communicative setting. When working on smaller teams, trust develops relatively quickly, and strong relationships contribute to creating a close-knit, family-type community. These relationships foster a strong sense of camaraderie in the workplace; however, it is important that as a company grows, leaders are properly equipped for the new requirements, demands, and changes of their roles.

With growth, these relationships and workplace dynamics can become complex. Leaders experiencing rapid growth and change together bond over their connection and success. As a company grows, it becomes challenging for leaders to maintain such close relationships with peers and direct reports. CEO’s may face new challenges in upholding their personal relationships or building team culture. Nevertheless, many CEO’s are reluctant to replace the individuals they have formed relationships with, even if the organization's needs have outgrown the individual's capabilities. Complex relationships in the workplace commonly lead CEO’s to make biased hiring and leadership selections that may not reflect the business's evolving needs. While friendships may be crucial for early growth, they can blind a CEO’s understanding of team members' strengths or weaknesses in leadership positions.

When a CEO’s relationships begin to impact leadership outcomes, it becomes challenging for that individual to take a step back and evaluate the team members’ qualifications from a holistic and objective point. However, recognizing and tackling this issue is essential to securing the longevity of a company’s success. CEO’s must prioritize finding a balance between personal connections and professional accountability by adopting strategies that will ensure the most qualified individuals hold leadership positions. Below are some tools to help enhance decision-making:

Implementing Performance Metric Tracking

The most effective way for a CEO to reduce the influence of personal relationships on decision-making is to use objective performance metrics. Concrete metrics allow CEO’s to analyze leaders' efficacy and evaluate the potential for future leaders based on quantifiable metrics rather than subjective opinions or relationships. Utilizing a tool such as AIM Insights to track, benchmark, and review performance metrics is crucial for improving data-based decision-making. Furthermore, AIM Insights may be a critical tool for leaders of expanding teams to track and manage their groups to maintain an objective record of performance.

Through defining key responsibilities and setting clear expectations, CEO’s can establish a fair and impartial system for evaluating individuals' suitability for a position. Utilizing measurable outcomes and enabling leaders and direct reports to view progress towards goals encourages transparent communication and accountability.

2. Promoting a Culture of Accountability

An additional tool in these scenarios is working towards creating a culture of accountability. Encouraging accountability within the workplace culture does not necessarily need to be set by the CEO or leadership team. Accountability can be encouraged by direct reports through open communication and feedback. Cultures of accountability welcome criticism and allow opportunities for individuals to learn from their mistakes.

Furthermore, if leaders are hoping to increase accountability practices within their teams, they should consider implementing a performance review process. Through formal feedback, employees are given the chance to reflect and improve on their practices, bettering the team and business as a whole.

3. Engaging Mentors or Executive Coaches

A final tool for minimizing bias in decision-making is engaging an outside party such as a mentor or executive coach. Because a mentor or coach is not immersed in organizational relationships, dynamics, or friendships, they are enabled to offer a different, likely clearer insight on the situation.

If an outside party observes the leadership team, they may be able to advise CEO’s as to the exact weaknesses in the organization. Additionally, consultants can suggest solutions and strategies to better these inadequacies without risking personal relationships or connections. A horizontal mentorship program could enable CEO’s to connect with other executives that may be able to provide clearer guidance in these situations. Many executives have had experiences with similar scenarios and can help CEO’s recognize when personal relationships cloud their judgment or give advice on prioritizing the businesses in decision making.

To promote the longevity of organizational success, CEO’s have to navigate the balance between fostering personal relationships and maintaining professional responsibilities. While leaders should certainly work to build team trust, upholding unbiased decision-making processes should be the primary objective. By leveraging tools such as AIM insights for performance metrics, implementing accountability practices, and including mentors or consultants, CEO’s can create a more objective approach to match leaders' capabilities with the needs of the growing company.

by Kayla Ambrose

Fri 4 April 2025

Louis is a French manager working at an international clothing company. While working in the French branch of the firm, Louis has been recognized numerous times for his strong leadership and effective communication. Due to his successes, Louis got relocated to the American branch of the firm to assist with the implementation of a new clothing line. After 2 months of managing in the United States, Louis is astounded to hear from a colleague that Louis’s team members have complaints about his leadership style. While Louis was an effective leader for his French team members, his incredibly direct leadership style comes across as cold and abrasive to his American team members. To effectively manage his new team, Louis must adjust his leadership style to accommodate the new cultures represented in his team.

Louis, like many managers of multicultural teams, relied on his home country’s culture and management styles when working with individuals from different cultures. While this management style may be effective in one's home country, it's crucial that managers adapt to the cultures within their teams. Whether relocating to another country or managing a cross-cultural team in one's home country, these are some strategies to leverage to effectively lead a multi-cultural team.

Increase Cultural Intelligence

When leading a cross-cultural team or managing in a foreign country, it’s important to conduct research about the other culture(s) to develop a deeper understanding. Cultures may vary drastically in their communication styles, views on hierarchy, methods of handling conflict, and other critical interpersonal aspects. Learning about these variances will allow managers to better understand how their team members think about and perceive the world.

There are various cultural frameworks that provide detailed breakdowns of differences between cultures that can enhance management effectiveness. Trumpenaars, Hofstede, and GlobeSmart are a few of the many existing frameworks that outline key cultural differences. Each framework has different dimensions that are used to evaluate cultures. Breaking down the different dimensions to understand them and thinking holistically about the differences in cultures will build a strong foundation for managing a cross-cultural team.

2. Acknowledge Cultural Differences

After researching different cultures to learn more about them, collaborate with the team to further understand critical cultural differences. While it may seem uncomfortable, encouraging open communication about cultural differences will take away some of the guesswork of trying to navigate a multicultural setting. Asking questions and learning about other cultures outside of the work environment will create an open space that embraces the variety of cultures.

While conducting research on other cultures creates a solid background of different cultures, recognize that learning from the team members is the best way to truly understand a culture. Furthermore, each person is different and may not entirely fit into the norms of their culture. Being curious and creating time to discuss these differences will demonstrate a desire to learn and grow together.

3. Establish Team Norms

Once cultural differences have been identified and discussed, establishing team norms will allow for improved workplace performance. Collaborate with the entire team when building these norms. Forming these norms as a group increases group buy-in and ensures all team members feel committed to the team norms.

Consider the variances in cultures and how they may shape the team norms. Some cultures tend to be extremely rigid with deadlines, while others have more flexible timing. Cultural differences in hierarchy may mean that some team members will seek more frequent approval from management while others may operate more autonomously. Make sure to establish clear norm expectations that take into consideration these different ways of working.

4. Overcommunicate

Within a cross-cultural team, overcommunicating can be a key to success. While it may seem redundant to constantly check in with team members, ensuring frequent communication will make sure everyone is on the same page. Especially at the beginning of team formation, prioritizing communication will prevent team members from making their own assumptions.

Cross-cultural teams may be comprised of individuals who have different first languages. It can be difficult to communicate when there is a language barrier within a team, so simplifying communication can prevent interpretation issues. While using less complex words and slowing down communication can make sure everyone understands what is being said, actively make sure to avoid foreigner talk. Foreigner talk is characterized by using slower and louder speech, which can be offensive to non-native speakers.

5. Avoid Assumptions

While it’s natural to have a perception of different cultures, actively make sure it avoid assumptions about individuals based on their cultural identity. Furthermore, avoid assuming that everyone on the team is in agreement or has a shared understanding. Cultures vary on how people indicate they agree with something, so assuming that everyone is on the same page simply because there is no vocal disagreement is not a reliable strategy. Leveraging strong communication and feedback mechanisms will help to avoid making incorrect assumptions.

Another assumption that is often made in cross-cultural settings is based on language ability. When someone is more fluent in a language, they are often perceived as more capable than individuals who are less fluent. Make sure to avoid making assumptions of cognitive ability solely based on language skill as the team may over or underestimate team member abilities.

Incorporating these strategies can be challenging, as there are many dynamics involved in culture. Recognize that it takes time to adjust management styles and its a constantly evolving process. To gain insights on effective strategies for managing a cross-cultural team, leverage performance management software. Managers may also find it helpful to discuss challenges with peer mentors to learn about the strategies they found most effective when dealing with similar challenges.

Through the use of these 5 strategies, Louis was able to adjust his management style to fit the needs of his new team. Recognizing that Americans have a strong preference for less direct criticism and a stronger sense of team camaraderie, Louis implemented more team bonding activities and conversational feedback mechanisms. After shifting his management style, Louis saw a positive change in his team's productivity and was able to better support his team.

by Kendall Barndollar

Fri 7 March 2025

In many high-stakes negotiations, the ability to swiftly identify common ground can make or break a deal. Whether in business or personal circumstances, negotiation outcomes impact individuals in their everyday lives. In the business world, negotiations may be in contracts or partnerships, and in the personal world, negotiations may appear in large purchases, such as buying a house or car. In either setting, negotiators should prioritize collaboration and potential solutions to both parties' issues.

For many, negotiations can be anxiety-inducing. Many struggle in confrontational settings and because of that, will leave negotiations unsatisfied. Furthermore, negotiations occur at varying levels of complexity and emotional investment from different parties, heavily impacting the nature of the negotiation. Most individuals who struggle in confrontational settings do not see a path to common ground and thus, they will employ an avoidant or accommodating tactic, working to help the other party without fulfilling their own needs. Negotiators should prioritize finding areas of agreement, and common ground to move forward and find solutions. Here are 5 tips for individuals to prioritize finding common ground in negotiations:

Work to Establish Trust

Creating a trusting relationship is paramount to a mutually beneficial negotiation. Before beginning discussions on the debated points of a negotiation, it is crucial to establish a foundation of mutual trust and respect between parties. In many negotiation settings, trust and relationships can be easily formed or broken. Thus, establishing a trusting relationship will foster a cooperative environment which will enable both parties to be open about their priorities and interests. Most importantly, an open and honest forum creates opportunities for both parties to suggest potential solutions to the topic at hand.

Furthermore, negotiators should work to find a compromise by demonstrating a genuine interest and willingness to actively listen and understand the main concerns of the other party. A respectful and positive attitude can set the tone of the negotiation, leading to more collaborative and cooperative tactics over those that encourage competitiveness or contention. Without the foundation of trust, many negotiations may fall into emotionally charged or tense discussions, hindering future relationships. When both sides feel heard, and cared for and can trust the other party, they are more likely to compromise and find feasible solutions to satisfy each side's interests.

2. Ask Good Questions

Asking questions and using active listening to hear and understand the other party's responses is crucial to finding common ground in a negotiation. The best way to learn from the other party about their concerns or interests is simply to ask them. Asking detailed questions allows either party to clarify and further understand the complexities of the negotiation. When negotiators ask thoughtful questions, they signal a genuine interest in the other party’s perspective.

In asking specific questions to aid in a negotiation, negotiators should aim to find the other party's main interests, priorities, and motivations. After learning the main focuses of the other party, it is much easier to identify areas of potential overlap for solutions or a new way to collaborate for a resolution. Effective negotiators will adapt to alleviate risks or uncertainties in their discussions; asking questions can serve as a tool for clarifying and confirming information already discussed to determine final details or conditions of agreements.

3. Find Shared Goals

When either party has competing interests, identifying a zone of possible agreement is daunting. However, to agree, it is crucial to identify and discuss shared objectives to provide a foundation for collaboration. By focusing on these shared goals, negotiators can steer the conversation toward solutions that benefit both sides. A shift towards mutually beneficial solutions creates the environment necessary to find common ground.

Establishing shared goals fosters collaboration and trust in negotiation settings, enabling parties to discuss and debate individual topics in a more comfortable setting. Additionally, this collaborative mentality allows each party to pause for a moment and consider how they may fulfill the other party's concerns while still satisfying their own.

4. Keep Emotions Under Control

Even in tense or heated discussions, negotiators must manage their emotions. When emotions run high, parties may become defensive or combative in discussion, making it seem difficult to find common ground. By staying calm and composed, negotiators can continue the focus on the areas of discussion to foster a more collaborative and solution-focused environment.

If the opposing party seems to become emotional or upset, collaborative negotiators will practice empathy. In doing so, they may suggest a short recess or change the discussion to a different topic. Sometimes, the best way to find common ground can be by taking a break to reassess and understand the situation.

5. Know When to Walk Away

While the hope in negotiations is to agree, there are many situations in which it may not be possible to find common ground. To recognize these situations, negotiators should come prepared when entering negotiations with set prices or circumstances that are minimally acceptable. Furthermore, negotiators should consider all possible outcomes and alternatives to the negotiation to best strategize their argument and what agreements they may accept.

Finding common ground in negotiations can be challenging. Especially in situations where emotions may drive decision-making and stakes for success seem high, negotiators must work to find common ground. Through building a trusting relationship, and asking thoughtful questions, negotiators can work to understand the other party's position and motivation. Once the other party's reasoning is better understood, negotiators can work to find shared goals, even if each party may have different intentions. After identifying shared goals, negotiators should work to carry out the negotiation while practicing empathy and controlling emotions. By fostering a collaborative atmosphere and prioritizing mutual understanding, negotiators are better equipped to achieve successful outcomes even in high-stakes or emotionally charged situations. In practicing these strategies, negotiators can work to find common ground and areas for mutually beneficial solutions.

by Kayla Ambrose

Fri 7 March 2025

Janet is a COO who oversees four VPs, who collectively manage 16 directors and a total of 100 employees who report to them. While each of the teams consistently meets their deadlines, Janet wants to ensure that all employees have a consistent positive experience across the organization. Janet recognizes that some managers are incredibly strong leaders who motivate and embrace the strengths of their direct reports. Janet also knows that some of her managers are more task-oriented, focusing solely on completing the tasks at hand without supporting their team members.

Even with positive results, Janet recognizes that consistent management is critical for a unified environment and a cohesive experience for all employees. Empowering all levels of leadership to incorporate communicative and supportive leadership styles can develop this organizational consistency.

Why Leadership Consistency is Critical

When employees have a strong task-based manager that doesn’t emphasize the individual values each team member contributes, employees will have a perception that this is the organization’s standard practice. If employees don’t have meaningful personal and professional interactions with their managers, there will be lower employee morale and retention rates. Employees who don’t receive strong leadership from their managers may develop a negative view of the company, which may discourage them from accepting other roles within the organization.

While Janet and her 4 VP’s may practice people-focused leadership, one of her directors may have a rigid management style that doesn’t involve building relationships with their team members. Now, all the directors' direct reports have a perception that Janet’s organization doesn’t care about their employees. Just because one manager doesn't prioritize their employees, the entire organization suffers from this perception of poor leadership. Without strong, people-focused leadership, employees might feel undervalued, decreasing their motivation to provide meaningful contributions. Furthermore, a lack of consistent support from their manager can slow career development, encouraging employees to seek opportunities with better growth prospects.

To prevent this, organizations must promote leadership development so managers understand the importance of meaningfully engaging employees and supporting them through their tasks. Providing leadership training, encouraging their participation in executive mastermind groups, developing open communication, and setting clear managerial expectations can create a more consistent leadership approach that values and recognizes all employees.

Developing Consistent Leadership Across an Organization

It can be challenging to encourage managers to change their leadership styles because they are comfortable with their current approach. Here are strategies for developing and maintaining cohesive leadership across the organization:

Align Leadership Styles with Company Values

How managers lead their teams should directly reflect the goals and values of the organization. A company's values are what guides employees and unifies them around a common goal. Leveraging these established values allows leaders to resonate to create a culture that accurately reflects these values.

Encourage all managers to demonstrate the company values in their daily interactions. Using these values, a more people-focused leadership style should also be reinforced consistently through leadership meetings and company-wide messaging.

2. Incorporate Leadership Development Training

Especially for managers who aren’t used to a more people-centered leadership style, incorporating effective leadership development training can provide clarity on how managers should implement changes. Offer structured training programs to inform managers of effective leadership techniques.

Adopting mentorship amongst leaders is another powerful way to implement changes. Allowing more senior leaders who excel in people-centered leadership to guide managers who struggle in this area can encourage productive change. Collaboration on developing a more people-centered leadership style will enhance the consistency of these efforts.

3. Set Expectations and Tools to Evaluate Them

Ensure all managers are aware of the expectations and have ways to help them gauge their effectiveness. Develop a framework that outlines expectations for managers regarding employee feedback, conflict resolution, and motivating team members.

Utilize performance management tools such as AIM Insights to help managers evaluate and track their team's performance. This allows managers to see the effectiveness of the changes in their leadership styles.

4. Promote Leadership Accountability

With expectations clearly outlined, ensure that all managers are adhering to the new standards. Addressing inconsistencies as they arise and helping managers navigate these difficulties are important components of improving leadership styles.

Provide support for managers who are struggling to make changes to be more people-focused. Supporting managers through individual coaching, feedback, and performance improvement plans can uplift managers who need more guidance.

AIM Insights as a Tool for Management Consistency

AIM Insights is an analytics tool designed for managers to gather feedback and gauge the productivity of their teams. Utilizing key metrics, AIM Insights provides specific feedback for leaders and allows them to benchmark their performance alongside leaders of similar teams. Upon team members' completion of AIM Insights surveys, leaders receive feedback and strategies on ways to improve their performance. For a company striving to ensure a standard of excellence in management, AIM Insights is a powerful tool to transform management styles and promote continuity.

Initially, managers may struggle to implement a more people-focused management style, not knowing how to have conversations that focus on professionally developing their direct reports. Utilizing performance management software such as AIM Insights provides managers guidance about what to discuss during one-on-ones with each employee based on feedback that is received. Implementing this software across an organization is a key step in transforming management styles and developing stronger cohesion.

Creating a consistent management approach across the organization strengthens management at every level. When leadership styles consistently reflect the company values, employees feel more valued and engaged in their work. Cohesive leadership fosters a positive workplace culture, allowing the organization to have sustained growth and excellence.

by Kayla Ambrose

Fri 7 February 2025

Managers play an important role in their teams, serving as a leader and guide. While managers' involvement in projects can promote growth for their team members, constantly overseeing team members and micromanaging them can lead to direct reports feeling untrusted and unsupported. Leaders with micromanaging behaviors often have good intentions, but stifle productivity through ineffective leadership styles.

When dealing with a micromanager, it’s challenging to determine how to navigate the situation. While it may seem uncomfortable, addressing concerns to the micromanaging manager in a professional manner is the best way to promote positive change. Working under a micromanager is exhausting and causes the entire team’s morale to suffer. Communicating the negative implications of micromanaging and working to develop a solution will overall create a better team dynamic.

Micromanagers typically don’t recognize that they are exhibiting these traits within their teams which is why it must be addressed through a conversation. While it may be intimidating to address a manager about their negative behaviors, their actions are majorly impacting the team. Micromanaging is making the work environment miserable for the whole team, and if unaddressed, will force the team to continue to suffer. Since micromanaging is already causing so much harm to the team environment, having a conversation has the potential to majorly improve the managers’ behaviors.

Understanding the Cause of Micromanaging

Micromanaging is a pattern of behaviors that often stems from fear of failure and lack of trust of other members of the team. Managers have a lot of responsibilities, and the excessive pressure can cause them to be particular and overbearing on their direct reports. While micromanaging isn’t a positive solution, it is important to recognize that these behaviors originate from wanting the team to succeed. Lacking trust is another main cause of micromanagement. If a manager doesn’t have established trust with their direct reports, they may be compelled to become overly involved in their assignments. Since the team’s work is the responsibility of the manager, they may want more frequent and detailed communication because they want to ensure a successful end result.

While there are various reasons a manager micromanages their team, recognizing the cause of these actions is a critical step in addressing the issue. Going into a conversation with the mindset that a manager is terrible because they are micromanaging isn’t a productive way of thinking. Since managers often exhibit micromanaging behaviors due to their desire for the team to succeed, it’s important to enter the conversation with the intent to adjust their behaviors for the mutual goal of supporting the team.

Strategies for Addressing a Micromanager

Describe the Effect on the Team

Everyone on the team wants the team to succeed. With this common goal in mind of supporting the team, describe how this managing style is an obstacle to the team’s progress. Discussing different implications of their behaviors, such as how the team must sacrifice limited work time to constantly communicate updates with their manager rather than making progress on their assignments, can help a manager better understand the real impacts the micromanaging is having.

When addressing the behaviors, make sure to utilize ‘I’ statements rather than ‘you’ statements. By discussing the personal impacts of their actions, a manager is less likely to feel attacked and be on the defensive. Using such statements opens the conversation up to be more collaborative. Owning the personal effects of their behavior rather than blaming the manager, communicates concerns in a way that promotes positive problem-solving.

2. Establish Trust

Since a lack of trust can cause micromanaging, working to develop a stronger working relationship with the micromanaging manager can establish more trust. During the conversation, collaborate on a solution that can encourage more autonomous work, while still allowing the manager to feel updated. For example, scheduling weekly meetings to share progress can alleviate hovering while working on assignments. Working together to devise a strategy that balances each other's needs, can begin to establish a foundation of trust.

Managers may also lack trust because they aren’t confident in the abilities of their team members. Utilize this conversation as a moment to solicit feedback about areas of improvement. Working to develop skills can allow a manager to be more confident when assigning tasks and be less compelled to constantly check in. Establishing credibility through a stronger skill set will ultimately continue to create a more trusting relationship and minimize micromanaging behaviors.

3. Provide Specific Expectations

As discussed, this conversation should include specific examples of instances when micromanaging behaviors are negatively impacting the team. Not only should the conversation address specific concerns, but a focus should also be placed on providing solutions. Collaborating to derive specific methods that the manager can adjust their behavior to better support the team will create a solid action plan. Without tangible steps for them to implement, it can be difficult to have an actual change going forward.

4. Suggest Accountability Tools

Another topic to discuss during this conversation is accountability tools. Scheduling meetings to revisit this conversation and collaboratively evaluate progress over time can also ensure accountability. Additionally, considering performance management tools for the manager to implement can work to reduce micromanaging behaviors. Tools such as AIM Insights can allow managers to better gauge their direct reports' performance without hovering over their work. Considering alternative creative approaches is a productive way to conduct this conversation with a micromanaging manager.

Oftentimes managers are unaware of their micromanaging behaviors. As a direct report, it can be intimidating to address these behaviors, but it's important to remember that the issues will persist if undressed. When conducting this conversion, focus on giving specific ways these actions are harming the team, establish a trusting relationship, devise ways these behaviors can be adjusted, and collaborate on accountability tools to ensure tangible changes are made.

by Kendall Barndollar

Fri 7 February 2025

Effective communication is the most paramount element to success for every team. It is crucial for expectations and responsibilities to be clearly communicated and understood for goals to be met. However, managers frequently fail to communicate effectively. Without clear communication, teams often feel confused and frustrated and have demonstrated decreased productivity throughout groups. Poor communication can appear in a variety of mediums, including unclear instructions or responsibility expectations leading to repeated work or missed deadlines. When communication issues go unaddressed, they can contribute to an unhealthy work environment, hindering productivity and achievement and fostering a negative culture.

The consequences of poor communication can be very impactful to a team. Group members experiencing communication issues commonly feel aggravated, unengaged, or confused, which all lead to an overall decrease in efficiency, team-wide. Another significant problem with poor communication is the elimination of critical feedback that is necessary for growth and improvement. Without proper feedback, employees may struggle to improve their performance or coordinate effectively with their team members.

For direct reports, initiating a conversation about communication challenges can be a daunting task. But, poor communicators will not realize their ineffectiveness unless someone brings it to their attention. Many employees fear that bringing up an issue such as this with a director may be viewed as criticism rather than constructive feedback. To avoid this issue, direct reports should phrase the meeting as a strategy session to talk about effective communication methods for the team. Rather than presenting flaws and personal attacks, direct reports should present solutions for the issues the team experiences, without pointing fingers. Fostering an open and honest conversation about communication gaps is essential for improving team culture and is a cornerstone to improving productivity.

Meeting with a Manager

Prior to addressing communication concerns with superiors, direct reports need to recognize and document the specific issues affecting the team. Poor communication can happen through any medium but identifying the root of the issues will help in creating a strategy to improve. Some common indicators of ineffective communication are vague or confusing instructions, last-minute changes, and inconsistent messaging, creating a lack of transparency across a team. Perhaps most notably, managers will realize there has been a communication failure when a deadline or important deliverable is missed or inadequate.

When discussing potential improvements with a leader, direct reports should be sure to come up with specific examples and targeted solutions. Rather than making ambiguous or vague statements, team members should really bring light to the problems the team has experienced with concrete examples of the patterns observed. Pointing out these issues with appropriate solutions aids in the manager's understanding of how an action may be affecting their team.

By clearly explaining the problems and offering some solutions, a collaborative approach to problem-solving can be achieved to improve communication habits. When discussing potential solutions, direct reports should consider any tool that could benefit the group or team. When struggling with communication, team members may offer a variety of solutions including scheduling consistent check-in meetings, sending meeting recap emails, utilizing goal-tracking software, or holding open brainstorming sessions. By narrowing the focus to specific issues with proactive solution possibilities, team members can assist team leaders in building a beneficial communication environment.

By pinpointing communication gaps, offering constructive feedback, and open communication methods, employees are enabled to improve the overall working environment of their team. Through proactive communication, direct reports can help lead the team to become a highly productive and collaborative group.

Building Communication Culture

Although many communication issues can stem from a team leader or manager, it is also the group members' responsibility to uphold a beneficial communication culture within their team. To find sustainable changes for a team, members should work to build a communication norm of open and honest communication. Creating a norm of open communication dialogue will enable managers to share feedback and areas of improvement better, improving the skills of team members.

The most crucial step to fostering open communication is establishing repeating opportunities for providing feedback. Leaders should be open to hearing what their direct reports have to say, whether, in questions or suggestions for new ideas, both parties grow from giving and receiving feedback. Managers who prioritize psychological safety within their teams will see the most success in creating an open dialogue within their teams. Creating a safe space where team members feel empowered to learn from each other and embrace mistakes will enable further conversation and collective growth. Although the onus may be on the manager to set the tone, it is the team's responsibility to consistently contribute and engage in communication to foster a positive culture.

Overcoming previous communication issues to rebuild a positive communication norm within a team can be challenging. Oftentimes a poor tone at the top can influence the entire team to shift to ineffective communication. Team members and direct reports struggling with the manager's communication should recall that it is likely, not intentional. A difficult factor of communicating is that leaders who are poor communicators usually will only find out at the failure or collapse of a project or effort. Managers are commonly unaware of how their communication style and habits will impact the team. By finding specific examples of miscommunications, matching the resulting impact, and suggesting targeted solutions, members of a team can contribute to improving a communication issue.

Effective communication is essential for every team but can be a common struggle for leaders. Miscommunication can create frustration, confusion and can deteriorate the productivity within a team as well. Direct reports play a vital role in bringing communication issues to light with their superiors and finding targeted solutions to approach communication flaws. Beyond individual conversations, direct reports have a key responsibility to uphold and practice positive communication habits and foster a productive team environment. Through proactive planning and innovative thinking, communication issues can be overcome to build a strong, collaborative, and efficient team culture.

by Grace Tripathy

Fri 7 February 2025

The Problem of Being “Too Valuable to Promote”

Emily was a top performer. As an operations specialist at a fast-growing tech firm, she had spent three years mastering her role, streamlining processes, and consistently exceeding performance metrics. But despite her clear qualifications and aspirations for growth, her manager, Dan, continued to stall her promotion. It wasn’t that Dan didn’t recognize her talent; he depended on it. The thought of replacing Emily, training someone new, and potentially losing productivity made him hesitant to let her advance.

This situation is more common than employees might think. A manager may not consciously sabotage an employee’s growth, but their reluctance to let go of a high-performing team member can create an invisible career ceiling. The challenge for employees like Emily is navigating this bottleneck strategically, ensuring they don’t remain stuck in a role that’s too convenient for management to change.

The Manager’s Perspective

From Dan’s point of view, Emily was a linchpin in the team’s success. She handled high-priority tasks with precision, trained new hires, and solved problems before they escalated. Promoting her meant finding someone equally competent, training them, and accepting a potential period of reduced efficiency—all of which felt like unnecessary risks.

However, this mindset can be detrimental to both the employee and the organization. Companies that fail to promote from within risk losing top talent, damaging morale, and sending a message that growth opportunities are limited. For Dan, he needs to be sure about how to evaluate whether someone is ready for a promotion as well. Emily knew she had to approach the situation with both patience and a strategic plan.

How to Talk to Your Manager About a Promotion When They Resist Change

Emily understood that directly confronting Dan about his reluctance would not be effective. Instead, she needed to frame the conversation in a way that addressed his concerns while advocating for her own growth. Here’s how employees in a similar situation can navigate this discussion:

1. Acknowledge the Manager’s Concerns

Rather than jumping straight into why she deserved a promotion, Emily started by recognizing Dan’s perspective. She acknowledged that she understood how valuable she was to the team and expressed appreciation for the opportunities she had been given.

2. Frame the Promotion as an Organizational Benefit

Instead of making it about personal growth alone, Emily highlighted how her promotion would ultimately benefit the company. She emphasized that stepping into a leadership role would allow her to:

Train and mentor others, ensuring long-term team stability
Take on more strategic responsibilities that could enhance department efficiency
Help develop a structured transition plan to minimize disruption

3. Offer a Transition Plan

To alleviate Dan’s fears about losing her expertise, Emily presented a plan outlining how she could gradually transition her responsibilities to a successor. This included training a replacement, documenting key workflows, and ensuring continuity in her absence.

4. Set Clear Career Goals and Expectations

Emily then asked Dan directly: “What steps do you see as necessary for me to move into a leadership role?” By shifting the conversation toward actionable SMART goals, she encouraged Dan to define what he needed to see from her before approving a promotion.

5. Get a Commitment and Timeline

To prevent the conversation from becoming an indefinite discussion, Emily worked with Dan to set a timeline for reevaluating her promotion. They established measurable benchmarks and agreed to revisit the conversation within three months to track progress.

Instead of assuming her manager’s intent, Emily scheduled a one-on-one strategy session with Dan. This wasn’t just a casual career check-in—it was a structured conversation with a clear agenda:

Align on expectations: What does Dan believe needs to happen for Emily to be promoted?
Identify gaps: Are there specific skills, leadership qualities, or accomplishments Dan wants to see?
Establish a timeline: What is a realistic timeframe for promotion, and what benchmarks must be met?

One of Dan’s biggest concerns was replacing Emily. To ease this, she proactively began training a junior colleague, documenting workflows, and suggesting a transition plan. By demonstrating that her team wouldn’t suffer in her absence, she removed one of Dan’s key barriers to promoting her.

Emily also recognized that promotions often require advocacy from more than just a direct manager. She began increasing her visibility within the company by:

Volunteering for cross-departmental projects
Seeking mentorship from senior leaders
Presenting her work and contributions in leadership meetings

This approach ensured that multiple decision-makers recognized her readiness for advancement.

6. Framing the Promotion as a Win-Win

Rather than positioning the conversation as a personal request, Emily framed her promotion as a strategic move for the company. She highlighted how moving into a leadership role would allow her to drive greater impact, mentor others, and enhance team efficiency.

This reframing helped Dan see the long-term benefits rather than focusing on the short-term inconvenience.

7. Setting a Deadline for Action

To avoid endless delays, Emily and Dan agreed on a clear timeline for revisiting the promotion decision. They set a three-month period to track progress against defined objectives. This ensured accountability and kept the conversation from becoming an indefinite cycle of “maybe later.”

Employees like Emily must recognize their manager’s concerns while advocating for their own growth. By aligning on expectations, developing a transition plan, and framing the promotion as a win-win, they can shift the conversation from reluctance to action. Ultimately, career advancement isn’t just about proving capability; it’s about making it easy for decision-makers to say yes.

by Kendall Barndollar

Fri 24 January 2025

In the modern workplace, prioritizing clear and effective communication is paramount to team and individual success. Sustained productivity is fostered through effective capacity management and maintaining morale while preventing burnout. While to-do lists continuously grow, many struggle to communicate their overwhelm or burnout to their managers. Without clear communication, many will stay silent or eventually leave the organization, eliminating the possibility of collaborating and growing through innovative solutions.

Addressing capacity management issues with a boss can be daunting, many fear they will be perceived as lazy or ‘not team players’. To change the tone of these meetings, professionals should suggest strategy sessions to propose solutions to the problems they are experiencing. The key to discussing these issues with a superior is to switch the mindset from discussing problems to proposing solutions.

For example, let's consider Joe, who manages a team of about 15 professionals at an emerging tech company. Joe’s team generally has a pretty productive team culture and they work really well together. In the past few months, the team has been working around the clock for a launch date in two weeks. Throughout the project, Joe noticed interpersonal conflict and tensions continuously heightened as the deadline became near.

Joe’s boss, Rebecca, emailed to inform him of an exciting new client the company has just landed and how Joe’s team will be involved in the project, with a deadline in two weeks. Joe becomes worried because he knows his team has already been putting in overtime and it will jeopardize their team culture and productivity to add another task to the to-do list with a short deadline. Joe schedules a meeting with Rebecca to discuss their management strategy for his team.

If Joe comes to the meeting angry or upset about the tasks needed from his team, Rebecca will likely not have a positive response. She may think members of Joe’s team are not contributing, or that Joe has not adequately instructed and motivated them to complete their deliverables. Instead, Joe should come to the meeting with potential solutions and an open mindset to discuss deprioritizing certain tasks or finding alternative solutions to manage the workload. Through a productive conversation, Joe can foster a collaborative approach to capacity management; listening to his team, discussing with his superior, and finding a balance. Furthermore, in advocating for his team, Joe would have contributed to building team trust and enforcing a productive, positive environment.

More than being able to manage a team's capacity, proactive capacity management prevents immediate burnout and stress, setting a foundation for long-term productivity and collaboration. Managers monitoring and adjusting workloads to reflect appropriate team capacity build a strong, connected, and supported workforce. Employees feel a stronger organizational commitment and value to the organization and team when understood. When employees are more committed and aligned with the organization, they have higher job satisfaction and strive for growth in their roles.

Additionally, a well-managed team can more effectively handle unexpected challenges, as they are not already operating at their highest capacity. Flexibility and adaptability ensure smooth project executions and foster innovation when team members work together to find solutions. By prioritizing capacity management, managers enable their teams to cultivate positive environments for clear and effective communication and collaboration. Here are 3 foundational aspects to recall for managers working on capacity management:

Open Communication

The most critical aspect of being able to effectively manage a team's capacity is establishing clear, effective, and open communication. Without communication, managers would only find out of instances of capacity overload from failures to meet deliverables or assignments. By encouraging open discussion, managers can cultivate a communication culture that empowers the voices of their direct reports and, prevents team failure or backup. Furthermore, to truly manage capacity, managers need to communicate effectively with their executives in order to meet deadlines.

2. Work-Life Balance & Psychological Safety

Another prominent aspect of prioritizing capacity management is considering work-life balance and psychological safety within the office. Work-life balance ensures that team members do not struggle in their personal lives for work and psychological safety prioritizes a positive team culture and mindset. By focusing on these two factors, managers are able to better grasp the capacity and boundaries of their teams.

3. Training and Development

A final foundational aspect of capacity management is the training and development opportunities available to teams. To truly improve a team's capacity without conceding accuracy or work quality, organizations need to invest time and resources into team training and development. Depending on the organization these experiences may take different forms and could be team bonding exercises, technical classes, or skills workshops that improve team productivity.

Managers concerned with overloading their team or those struggling with capacity management should consider utilizing goal-setting and tracking software. Many managers face challenges in capacity management because they do not appropriately gauge the capacity of individuals and teams. Through goal-tracking software such as AIM Insights, managers and their direct reports can benchmark goal achievement and progress. Furthermore, utilizing tracking software enables managers to have a more objective view of overall progress and growth. Finally, through utilizing software, managers are able to self-reflect and grow through provided feedback.

Proactive capacity management is essential to sustain productivity, and team morale while preventing burnout. Through fostering open communication, encouraging a healthy work-life balance and team environment, and providing continuous training opportunities, managers create an adaptable and productive workforce. Through leveraging tools to understand team members' goals and progress, managers are enabled to be great leaders who vouch for their team. Ultimately prioritizing proactive capacity management creates a foundation for long-term success and a sustained positive team culture.

by Kayla Ambrose

Fri 24 January 2025

A manager is responsible for ensuring deadlines are met and tasks are completed. Naturally, managers want the best for their team and are willing to assume more roles in order to help their team achieve success. Once managers begin completing entry-level tasks, strive for absolute perfection, and become overly attentive to their direct reports, they enter the territory of micromanaging.

Although micromanagement often develops with good intentions for wanting the team to succeed, this management style can cause a lot of unintended consequences. When direct reports experience micromanaging, creativity is stifled, morale is decreased, and trust is lost. Micromanagement doesn’t just negatively impact employees, the additional effort used by managers who micromanage leads to severe exhaustion. Despite these negative implications on teams, micromanagers often continue these behaviors because they fail to recognize that they are micromanaging.

How to Recognize Micromanaging Behaviors?

1. Reluctance to Delegate

An indication of micromanagement is resistance to delegating tasks. As a manager with more experience than other team members, it may feel challenging to assign tasks to direct reports who may have more underdeveloped skill sets. Something important to consider is the opportunity cost of completing these more entry-level tasks. Senior managers are more suited for higher-level tasks, so it wouldn’t be valuable for high-level managers to be completing entry-level tasks. Managers' time is more valuable on something that can only be completed with their knowledge and specific skill set.

Imagine if Tom Brady spent his life mowing lawns instead of playing quarterback. His great attention to detail and strong work ethic would allow him to be very good at mowing lawns, but this wouldn’t be the best use of his unique skill set as a professional athlete. The same idea translates to managers struggling to delegate tasks. When managers spend time completing tasks that their team can handle, they become like Tom Brady mowing lawns instead of winning with their team. Effective delegation isn’t solely about assigning tasks to employees It’s about recognizing the team's strengths and trusting them to complete tasks, allowing managers to focus on tasks only they can do as a leader.

2. Over Involvement in Employees Work

As a manager, it is critical to understand what team members are doing and how it contributes to the overall objectives of the team. Managers who take this a step further, through very frequent updates and constantly involving themselves in employees' work, become micromanagers. Although it can be tempting to step in and help an employee who is struggling, managers shouldn’t be constantly working with employees on their tasks or taking over for them.

Make sure to reflect on how frequently communication is conducted with employees. Managers who are constantly asking for updates and asking questions about minor details may be micromanaging their team. This is also applicable to managers who have employees constantly reaching out for confirmation. Whether or not it is explicitly stated, if employees frequently need to have their managers approve of interim task phases, there is likely a micromanaging relationship present.

3. Constantly Monitoring Employees

Another sign that a manager is a micromanager is how they monitor their employees. Constant oversight from managers can make employees feel scrutinized. Whether a manager is monitoring their team by being physically present or digital tools to keep tabs on everyone, a compulsion to constantly supervise employees is an indication of micromanaging.

Micromanagers often confuse visibility with control. While managers need to be informed about their team’s progress, there’s a difference between keeping track of outcomes and obsessively monitoring every detail within the process. A healthy management strategy is to build trust and open communication with team members so they feel empowered within their roles. Employees are more likely to feel motivated and deliver creative solutions when managers provide them with more autonomy.

Reflecting on the three previous behaviors is an important step to counteract micromanaging. Since it can be difficult to self-assess, asking for feedback from employees can be a powerful tool to recognize micromanagement. Creating an anonymous feedback mechanism where employees can share honest criticism can be a helpful way to diagnose micromanagement.

What are Ways to Reduce Micromangement Tendencies?

1. Develop Effective Communication Skills

Oftentimes, micromanaging can stem from managers stepping in when their employees are confused about a project. To prevent employees from becoming confused about a task, make sure to effectively communicate expectations. Not only should managers properly discuss what is expected from employees, but they must also encourage employees to ask questions to promote a better understanding.

2. Practice Delegating

Micromanagers struggle to delegate tasks and often assume way more responsibility than they should. To feel more comfortable delegating tasks, managers can practice delegating less complex responsibilities. Gradually shifting responsibilities to employees works to establish trust and build confidence for employees. Not only will employees become more confident, but managers will also become more confident in the competencies of their employees.

3. Expand Employees’ Skillsets

Micromaning often stems from managers feeling that their employees aren’t capable of completing their assigned tasks. Similar to practicing gradual delegation, managers should also collaborate with employees to further develop their skill sets. If an employee struggles with a particular software or another critical component of their role, managers can provide resources or specific training to help enhance their skills. By working to expand employees’ abilities, managers will be more confident in allowing their employees to assume more responsibility.

4. Establish a Growth Mindset

Fear of failure motivates managers to develop micromanagement behaviors. One way to counteract this fear of failure is to work on developing a growth mindset. Managers who are able to shift their thinking to consider setbacks as a learning opportunity are more able to let go of their micromanaging behaviors because they are less hyper-focused on ensuring a standard of perfection.

Changing subconscious behaviors is an incredibly difficult task. As a manager hoping to stop micromanaging tendencies, make sure to self-reflect often and evaluate the effectiveness of changes in management styles. Throughout this journey to stop being a micromanager, it is beneficial to receive guidance from peer mentors who have similar experiences. No one wants to be micromanaged and it isn't a productive strategy for managers either. Make sure to focus on the big picture and the benefits that will be experienced once micromanaging is out of the picture.

BLOG

How to Get Employees to Drive Innovation in a Corporate Turnaround

Companies need to lean on everyone to truly innovate

3 Tools to Reduce Bias in Executive Decision-Making

Bias can't exist for the best decision to be made

5 Best Practices for Managing Multicultural Teams

Managing across cultures can be difficult and require leadership flexibility

5 Tips for Finding Common Ground in Negotiations

Creating mutually beneficial outcomes is critical in negotiations

Creating a Consistent Employee Experience with Management Continuity Across Departments

People don't leave jobs, they leave bosses

4 Strategies for Addressing Micromanagers

Managing a micromanager is critical to your sanity

How to Give Feedback to Your Boss

Your boss needs feedback to improve

7 Steps to Overcoming the Barrier of Being Too Valuable to Promote

Advocating for your own career is critical to your development

The Importance of Proactive Capacity Management: 3 Ways to Get Your Boss Onboard When Your Team is Overloaded

Proactively managing your manager's expectations is critical to a healthy work environment

Managing Micromanagement: How to Reduce Micromanaging Behaviors

Reporting to a micromanager is unsustainable and leads to burnout

Recent Keywords

Recent Contributors